Paolo Sorrentino is definitely a talented director. His films considerably rely on visual
statements. Sorrentino’s This Must Be the Place indirectly urges
the film’s viewer to observe the details of visual statements, which often put
in context the quaint sense of humor of the spoken word in the film. That does not mean the viewer should miss the quirky spoken words either, such as the deadpan non sequitur "Why is Lady Gaga?" The most
important lines, stated nonchalantly, come mid-way into the film and those
lines are the key to understanding it:
“You have to choose a
moment in your life to be not afraid.”
“And have you chosen
that moment?”
“Yes, I have.”
Those critical lines explain the entire film for those who
might find the film exasperating to understand, beyond the obvious strands of
the film being a cocktail of a road movie, a detective movie and a
Nazi-criminal-hunt movie. It also a
vengeance movie but one that presents the antithesis of violence one associates
with Hollywood vengeance movies, a la Quentin Tarantino. The film is perhaps
best described as a psychological study about individuals who wear masks and
are able to remove their masks when they are no longer afraid and ultimately realize
they don’t need masks to survive. The film also gives importance to the time
and place when a life-changing moment in one’s life allows for an important
u-turn in your life, a point in life when you mentally grow up.
Cheyenne (Penn) and wife (McDormand) |
This Must Be the
Place is an unusual film and for many viewers half an hour into the film
will probably make them cringe away from looking at the screen and instead glance
in the wrong direction—the exit door. One is likely to have similar urges with
Sorrentino’s spectacular and more complex work The Consequences of Love (2004) as well. However, if you have some
forbearance, both films will prove to be audacious, intelligent and rewarding
provided you stay glued to the screen right up to the end of the film. And if
you do stay right up to the end, you are likely to be delighted to have viewed
cinema of a distinct and unusual quality and re-evaluate the early bits of any
Sorrentino film in a totally new light once the movie gets over. That is the amazing talent of Sorrentino. And Sorrentino is only 42!
Sorrentino is an Italian who has made his name with works
totally Italian. And yet his latest film which is only his fourth feature film, This
Must Be the Place is remarkably different: it is in English language, with
Hollywood actors, and capturing Americana as an American director would to the
bone. But the movie retains its European directorial style, just as German
Werner Herzog made Stroszek (1977)
or German Wim Wenders who made Paris,
Texas (1984) and decades later followed up with The Million Dollar Hotel (2000) in USA utilizing several Hollywood stars, some of whom were already
major actors elsewhere before they became to be known as Hollywood stars.
Fear of flying |
This Must Be the
Place has major Hollywood stars—Sean Penn and Frances McDormand. And Sean Penn does an amazing turn as a burned
out Goth Rock star, a character that is bizarre but will remain indelible in
the minds of most viewers. Sean Penn
wears lipstick, eyeliners, and a weird hairdo and talks slowly in a manner one
associates with drug addicts. You begin to wonder initially if Penn is playing
a transvestite and then you realize he is not. He is just a rock star caught in
a time warp and living retired life in Dublin, Ireland, as though he is still
mentally on stage before a live audience of screaming fans. We soon realize he
is not dangerous but an innocent and well-meaning husband with strange tastes
for his appearance. But Penn and Sorrentino create another dimension: Penn speaks slowly but in unusually high
pitch in this role and what he speaks is never tripe but often measured words
of wisdom. When being served a
cheeseburger, the waitress converses with Cheyenne (Sean Penn) and apologizes
that the burger is a bit too well done. “You
don’t mind, do you? Unfortunately that’s life” she adds. Cheyenne’s deadpan
response is “You know what the problem is...we
go on from an age where we say ‘My life will be that’ to an age where we say
‘That’s life’.” Or take another case when Cheyenne is offered a cigarette
he responds “Why with all the vices I indulged in I never took up smoking?” Now that is Sorrentino and co-scriptwriter Umberto
Contarello at work. All these lines tell
you that the film is definitely more than a road movie, a detective movie and a
Nazi-criminal-hunt movie.
Making contact, when in trouble, with his wife |
The opening shots of Sean Penn applying lipstick and
eyeliner and sporting the weird hairdo of Goth Rock musicians give the viewer a
clue. This is a mask of a troubled mind. But then the clues of what is bothering
Cheyenne only slowly tumble out. Despite the lovely house in Dublin (evidence
of sufficient financial security) and a 35 year old stable marriage with a loving
wife (Frances McDormand) who is a fire-fighter and loves “saving lives”, it is
easy for the viewer to note that Cheyenne is carrying heavy emotional baggage. We first learn that two teenage kids committed
suicide due to the lyrics of Cheyenne’s songs and this has affected him. Then
we learn of his fractured relationship with his father in USA, who is a Holocaust
survivor on his deathbed. We also note that an old woman and Cheyenne’s not-so-cheerful
neighbour in Dublin hates the sight of the old pop star every time he passes by
her window because she associates Cheyenne with her son who has left her for a
long while. And we realize that Cheyenne understands her pain: he himself is
suffering the pangs of a broken father-son relationship.
This Must Be the
Place is a film that suggests violence but does not show it—in fact the
film is an ode to non-violence. Sorrentino’s original script has some lovely
comments about the easy purchase of guns in USA. In a gun shop, in the film, a
customer comments: “If we are licensed to
be monsters, we end up with only one desire--to truly be monsters.” These
are the gems of a Sorrentino film that makes you think.
Sean Penn and Sorrentino build up Cheyenne’s character with
great care—it is part feminine, part childlike. The character is only
deceptively childlike. When someone remarks “Didn’t you use to drink a lot?” Cheyenne answers, “Enough to decide to stop.” The adult in
Cheyenne is revealed by the uncanny detective skills he employs to reach his
target—a Nazi criminal. He meets the Nazi criminal's wife as though he is an old student of
hers. He meets his Nazi criminal’s
daughter and grandchild and even sings a song at their request. To locate his
Nazi, Cheyenne chats up the inventor of adding wheels to bags (played by Harry
Dean Stanton, a mild reference to Wenders’ movie Paris, Texas).
With a native Indian |
As a road movie, there is even a silent but evocative drive
with a silent native Indian and a ping pong game where Cheyenne teaches
youngsters the finer points.
Without revealing the crucial outcome of the Nazi-criminal
and Cheyenne meeting, the more important aspect is how it transforms
Cheyenne. He has a haircut. He is able
to walk in Dublin with an energy that eluded him before his trip to see his estranged
father in USA. He can look straight in the eye of his neighbor looking at him
out of her window. Cheyenne has not just
physically changed, he has changed psychologically. He has dropped off the emotional
baggage. And the best part of the Sorrentino tale, the old woman gets
transformed by the sight of the new Cheyenne. She is able to see that one day
her own son could also return to her, transformed as Cheyenne has.
The visual tale |
What is remarkable about This Must Be the Place to make it one of the finest films of 2012?
Apart from the obvious remarkable performance of Sean Penn and Sorrentino’s
story/screenplay/direction, it is the film’s ability to raise the quality of
cinema by its images. All the four Sorrentino films released so far have Luca
Bigazzi, the cinematographer, making his definite imprint on the viewer. Bigazzi’s outdoor crane shots and the long shots
come alive on the big screen. Both in The Consequences of Love and This Must Be the Place (the only two
Sorrentino films that this critic has
seen) the alienation of the main
characters are accentuated by their physical loneliness captured on camera with
no individual in proximity. Even when filming scenes indoors, Bigazzi/
Sorrentino capture the loneliness with large spaces and distances. My favourite
scene is of Penn/Cheyenne sitting alone in a darkened room watching slides and
as the slides change the camera captures his face and the discrete changes in
emotions, punctuated by the total darkness that merges with his black hair. A remarkable
and clever sequence involving camerawork, screenplay and editing is how the
scene of David Byrne singing the title song is introduced into the film that
begins with woman sitting in an armchair in a closed room with the visuals
taking you to David Byrne performing and Cheyenne commenting on the song to
Byrne. However, in scenes where Penn and McDormand are together there is not
much of distance separating them as they are evidently portraying a happy
couple. (In an interview, Sorrentino revealed
that the close relationship and understanding in the film between Cheyenne and
his wife is built on Sorrentino’s own relationship with his wife.) Even in the shot of Cheyenne returning from
the US approaching the window of his neighbor who had earlier despised him the
physical distances between them appear to be reducing. Every shot in the Sorrentino
films reminds one of the visual distances you encounter in films of Antonioni.
Cheyenne is hyperactive playing handball with his wife in an empty swimming pool |
This Must Be the Place
might not be as great a film as The Consequences of Love but it
definitely proves that Sorrentino, Penn and Bigazzi are each remarkable in
their own individual but versatile contributions they have made to this lovely film. The film deservedly
won the Ecumenical Jury prize at the Cannes Film Festival 2012.
P.S. This Must Be the Place
is one of the top 10 films of 2012
for the author. Sorrentino’s The Consequences of Love has been reviewed earlier on this blog. Mr Sorrentino is also one the author's 15 favourite active filmmakers
I would like to start by thanking you for recommending another great film. I have no doubt whatsoever that I would have remained oblivious to it had you not analysed it (that too so elaborately) on your blog. This is my first Sorrentino film and it's really reassuring to know that the great Italian film legacy is in safe hands. Needless to say, I once again greatly benefited from your astute observations.
ReplyDeleteAlso, I must confess that I remained hooked throughout... not for a second did I feel like getting bored. It was liking watching 4-5 different films together... and that's what I love the most. The movie serves a great testament to Sorrentino's range as a filmmaker. Since I watched the movie without the subtitles I ended up missing certain crucial comments spoken by Penn. Once again your review proved quite handy.
Another thing that I thoroughly enjoyed was Sean Penn's acting. I have never been a great fan of his acting and often felt that he hammed it up in most of his critically acclaimed movies like Milk. It's really sad that the Academy honors mediocre performances but fails to acknowledge such great performances. But, his performance here completely changed my perception. It's amazing how great filmmakers push their actors to the limit and invariably get the best out of them.
I had one question about the movie's ending. Actually, I am finding it hard to decipher the symbolic meaning of the punishment that Penn's character inflicts on the Old German. You can mail it to me separately as it may serve as a spoiler for the readers of this blog. Also, I have read a lot about Wenders' Paris, Texas (1984) and The Million Dollar Hotel (2000) on this blog and elsewhere, but haven't yet managed to watch either. I am really curious to know certain details before I actually give them a try. So, it would be great if you could provide the answers to these two questions. What actually is their USP? Which one should I watch first?
Murtaza,
ReplyDeleteI will write to you separately about the Nazi and Cheyenne encounter.
The two Wenders films are both good and very European in style but then certain US filmmakers such as John Sayles (e.g.,"Limbo") and Rodrigo Garcia (e.g."Nine Lives") adopt similar approaches to filmmaking. By the way Garcia is the son of the famous writer Gabriel Garcia Marquez and "Nine Lives" was originally written by Rodrigo. I was toying with the idea of including "Nine Lives" in my best 20 US films list.
Don't miss out on Herzog's "Stroszek" either--film made in USA.
Thanks a lot for those valuable insights. I am huge fan of Gabriel Garcia Marquez and it's really heartening to know that his son has chosen cinema as the medium of his choice. I would definitely love to explore his works. Also, I have made a note of Stroszek along with Nine Lives and Limbo. Hopefully, I will watch them soon!!! Also, I suggest that you publish your top 20 US films on this blog as well... for the benefit of your readers :-)
ReplyDeleteOne facet of this film that I forgot to comment upon is its music. I just cannot praise it enough.
ReplyDeleteMurtaza,
ReplyDeleteYou might like to closely study how the David Byrne song sequence is introduced into the film's narrative.
Jugu
I love your stule of reviewing films. Thanks
ReplyDeleteI, too, would like to hear your interpretation of the scene between Cheyenne and the Nazi. I was also confused about the relationship between the sad neighbor and Cheyenne and of her happiness when Cheyenne returns transformed. I watched this on the Sundance Channel and there were commercials, so I think it was edited to fit the time slot. I was Left feeling that the movie was disjointed. I think that there must have been scenes edited out that were significant to the storyline. I would love to hear your feedback. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteI, too, would like to hear your interpretation of the scene between Cheyenne and the Nazi. I was also confused about the relationship between the sad neighbor and Cheyenne and of her happiness when Cheyenne returns transformed. I watched this on the Sundance Channel and there were commercials, so I think it was edited to fit the time slot. I was Left feeling that the movie was disjointed. I think that there must have been scenes edited out that were significant to the storyline. I would love to hear your feedback. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteAngela, I do not wish to provide details on this blog that would be "spoilers" for readers who have not seen the film. If you provide me your email, I hope to able to provide you with the requisite information.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Kiran, for bringing up the error to my notice. The version I had written was from memory after watching the film at a festival. I usually take down notes after a film viewing. I am now correcting the blog post accordingly. I had meant to recall the line "Why with all the the vices I have indulged in I never took up smoking?"
ReplyDelete