Grain is a very important film of 2017.
It is an important film for
several reasons. Globally, very few feature films have dealt
with agriculture as the focal point. In India, several important films were
made on social themes related to agriculture—Mother India (1957), Do
Bigha Zameen (Two acres of land)
(1953) and Upkar (Good Deed) (1967) are
examples. China’s Red Sorghum similarly dealt with society more rather than
agriculture. Even the celebrated Russian film, Dovzhenko’s Earth (1930) dealt with social issues of collective farming rather
than agriculture per se. Semih
Kapalonglu’s Grain is a rare feature
film where the focus is more on agriculture and science, and less on the social
fallouts. A rare film that could be compared to Grain in content is Richard Fleischer’s Soylent Green (1973)—a Hollywood film on a bizarre industrial
response to alarming global food shortages.
Grain is notable because the film highlights the viewpoint of those
who oppose the cultivation of genetically modified agricultural crops known as
GMOs. GMO crops are those crops that have their DNA artificially altered by a
process that does not happen naturally. The artificial process introduces genes
from a different species or organism into the natural crop, boosting the
ability of the altered crop/organism to survive diseases, insect pests,
fungi and even extreme climates. More
than half of the countries within the European Union have banned GMOs until
long-term studies conclusively prove these to be safe for long-term human and
animal consumption. The pro-GMO lobby asserts the modified crops are safe and
necessary to feed the increasing populations. The controversy has led to many
products sold in the market to be clearly marked as either “Organic” or “non-GMO”
for the consumer who cares to consume safe farm produce. Most GMO crops are
grown on soils treated by chemicals necessary for such GMO cultivation.
Chemical contamination of soils where GMO crops have been cultivated is another
growing source of concern highlighted in the film Grain.
Like the 2022 setting of the 1973
film Soylent Green, Kaplanoglu’s English
film is a sci-fi film that is set in the near future. In the film Grain, GMO crop cultivation is the accepted norm for the majority
of the population presented on screen and the private sector that develops and
promotes GMO crop cultivation is a formidable and unrelenting force if one
cares to challenge it. Soils have been
contaminated by the associated chemicals required to grow GMO crops. Immigrants from less-endowed nations crowd “processing”
centres hoping to be accepted by the richer countries even if they have to deal
with its strict policing. People die of strange epidemics and when they die
their bodies don’t rot or create a stench. This indeed is a dark subject fit to
be made in black and white rather than in colour.
Opening sequences of multi-ethnic immigrants seeking better food and life in countries with strict policing and controls |
Kaplanoglu is a known admirer of
the films of the acclaimed Soviet filmmaker Andrei Tarkovsky. Kaplanoglu’s earlier film Milk , a constituent of his
semi-autobiographical Yusuf trilogy, had a sequence where the protagonist’s
mother is sitting on a fence just as Tarkovsky’s
mother did in Tarkovsky’s famous autobiographical film Mirror (You could refer to the review
of Milk on this blog showing that
scene). There are several sequences in Grain that will remind a cineaste of Tarkovsky’s reflective sci-fi films Stalker and Solaris and even the theologically imbued final work Sacrifice, with a lone tree in a barren landscape.
Grain’s original script, written by Kaplanoglu and his wife Leyla
Ipecki, is not a typical sci-fi film. Beyond the sci-fi text is an overt layer
of theology that is remarkably close to the films of Tarkovsky and perhaps even
Kubrick’s 2001-A Space Odyssey. In
an interview with this author, Kaplanoglu revealed that the inspiration for
making this film came from a chapter/portion of the Holy Quran called Khef or the Kahf (cave) Sura . The entire film Grain questions the wisdom of human
beings tinkering with nature, what the Creator of earth provided and the
fallouts of such scientific meddling.
Stark beauty of Anatolia (Turkey) provide the location for the filmmakers where people in the film die suddenly from unknown epidemics |
The film is not about disparaging conventional
agricultural research involving hybrids and products of varietal cross breeding
but those specifically about tinkering with natural species to create man-made
species, and mindless destruction of natural resources in its wake for the sake
of profit. The film Grain attempts
to interconnect the life in a grain of wheat with life in humans, and how even lowly
ants instinctively try to collect and preserve naturally occurring non-modified
organic wheat grain for their own species’ survival. The argument the film
present is notable absence of the fictional “n” particle missing in GMO crops
but present in naturally bred crops.
The Prof (Barr) comprehends the importance of non-contaminated soil and natural organic farming devoid of chemicals |
Grain is also important as the director Kaplanoglu and
co-scriptwriter Ipecki try to contrast science with spirituality and theology.
The end product can befuddle many and yet offer food for thought to those
viewers who can pick up the details of spiritual metaphors, visual and verbal, that
pour in cascades.
The story of Grain revolves around a seed geneticist Prof Erol Erin (Jean-Marc
Barr, a French/American actor) who lives in a fictional city in the near future,
the inhabitants of which are protected from multi-ethnic emigrants with
electro-magnetic walls. “Erol” in Turkish means “brave.” For reasons unknown,
the city’s nearby agricultural resources have been hit by a genetic crisis. In
an internal meeting at the headquarters of the corporation that employs the
geneticist, he learns of a fellow scientist who wrote a thesis on “Genetic chaos and the N particle” about
the recurrent crises affecting genetically modified seeds is no longer employed
by the corporation. In pursuit of this
elusive scientist named Cemil Akmann (Ermin Bravo, a Bosnian actor), Prof Erin
meets up with his daughter, who is silently communicating on the computer in a
language unknown to the professor, living alone in a huge house in disrepair
and apparent neglect. A word that appears on her computer screen is ELOHA (the
Hebrew name for God). Prof Erin sets out to meet the fellow scientist in a
perilous journey and does find him. The journey, though totally different from Tarkovsky’s
Stalker, has several visual
references to the Russian film masterpiece. There are exquisite shits of the Anatolian
landscape in Turkey captured by cinematographer Giles Nuttgens adding hues of
mystery and awe in equal measure, somewhat like the desolate word of the Dead Zone
in Stalker. In Stalker,
there is a stray dog that inspects the sleeping travellers; in Grain, a wolf inspects the tent of the
sleeping Prof Erin. In both films, there is only a thin line that divides
dreams and reality. In Grain, a
child converses to the professor in the night in a dream sequence and then
disappears under equally strange circumstances into the darkness. (Dreams play
significant roles in two very important films of 2017: Grain and the Hungarian film On
Body and Soul.) After meeting
Akmann, Prof Erin prefers the life style of Akmann and chooses not to return to
the city.
Two scientists, Cemil Akmann (Bravo) and Prof Erol Erin access the non-contaminated soil that can grow true organic crops and fall asleep after transporting it to useful locations for safe use |
The film even includes a visual of
burning bush that will strike a chord with viewers familiar with texts of the three
Abrahamic religions. The Burning Bush on Mount Horeb (mentioned in the Book of Exodus in The Bible)
is a bush that is never consumed by the fire and Moses is directed by God to
remove his footwear as per the ancient religious texts, as he approaches the bush,
while tending Jethro’s flocks. But is the Professor actually encountering the
burning bush/tree or is it a dream? Those who have read the religious texts will
associate the Burning Bush as a holy ground from where God speaks to Moses.
The film Grain begins with ultra modern electro-magnetic walls to keep out undesirable
human beings and ends with a sequence where Akmann and Prof Erin spend time
inspecting a stonewall, removing a stone here and there to peer through the gaps
in the wall to glimpse Paradise. As in the end of 2001--A Space Odyssey, the final silent spectacle speaks for
itself. Kubrick was an atheist;
Kaplanoglu is not.
Sleeping among growing crops, like a child in a mother's womb--touches of Tarkovsky |
The two scientists team up |
This is a film that is important
for viewers familiar with the GMO debate.
The pro-GMO enthusiasts will debunk the science in this English film,
which is a Turkish-German-Swedish-French-Qatari co-production. According to the director, the film has been wilfully
kept out of certain important film festivals that wanted to initially screen
the film by the influential pro-GMO lobby. In spite of this, the film won the
top award at the Tokyo film festival. The film was shot in Michigan (USA), in Germany
and in Turkey. Visually the film is stunning in its stark beauty—an antidote to
colour and natural flora that one encounters in commercial cinema. The subject itself
is an antidote to the prescription of a better world as seen by the private
sector corporations for us.
Whether one agrees with the basic
scientific premise of the film or not, Grain
is definitely one of the most important films of 2017, arguably the most ambitious
work of Kaplanoglu, especially for any reflective viewer with either an
interest in science or in theology/spirituality.
P.S. The film Grain won the Best Film award at the recent Tokyo Film Festival and is included among the author's top 10 films of 2017. The
Kaplanoglu films Honey and Milk have been reviewed
earlier on this blog. The Tarkovsky films Solaris and Mirror, mentioned above, have also been reviewed earlier on this
blog. The
Hungarian film On Body and Soul has
also been reviewed on this blog. Turkey did not submit the film to compete for the Best Foreign Language film Oscar as the film was primarily in English. (Click on the coloured name of the film in this post-script
to access that review)
No comments:
Post a Comment