Very few films deal with philosophy and ethical human
choices under extreme testing situations.
The Fifth Seal is one that
not only presents a philosophical dilemma on screen but will make any intelligent
and sensitive viewer to ponder over his or her own choice under similar
circumstances. The film directed by
Zoltan Fabri (1917-94) won the Golden Prize of the Moscow Film Festival in
1977. The film is based on a novel written by Ferenc Santa, arguably the finest
Hungarian writer who has won almost all the top honours in that country. Santa himself
wrote the screenplay of the film and, therefore, one can guess the film reflects
the novel’s content pretty accurately. This is the second work of Fabri that was
based on a Ferenc Santa novel—the first being Twenty Hours (1965). Both films won the top award in the respective
years at the Moscow Film Festival. The Fifth
Seal is one of the top 100 films of this critic and the film made such a
positive impact on him that he travelled to Budapest in 1982 and succeeded in
interviewing the director. (The exclusive interview was published in the English
daily newspaper, The Telegraph, of Kolkata,
India, in 1982.)
The book seller, the watchmaker. the carpenter, and the bar keeper meet as usual -- the photographer (with his back to the camera) is invited to join them |
The basic debate on conscience is raised during a meeting of
four friends in a Budapest bar, set during the Nazi occupation of Hungary
during World War II, though the film/novel focuses on the Hungarian Arrow Cross officials who sympathized with the Nazis. But the mention of the
Russians replacing the Arrow Cross,
give away the obvious intention of the writer/director. The question thrown up in The Fifth Seal is, if we were to die today, whether one would like
to be reborn as a powerful, rich, cruel dictator/slave owner who does not
believe he/she is doing anything unethical or as a slave who is poor and is continuously
brutalized and humiliated by his/her master and yet is happy that he/she has
not done any action that is wrong in spite of his/her powerless condition.
Keszei, the photographer, makes the crucial soliloquy quoting the relevant passage of the Bible on the Fifth Seal |
To appreciate The Fifth
Seal sufficiently, it would help
considerably if the viewer has some knowledge of the Holy Bible and of visual
art, specifically the works of the Dutch artist Hieronymus Bosch (1450-1516).
The reasons are simple. The title of the film refers to the following excerpt
from the Holy Bible:
“When he opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of those who had been slain because of the word of God and the testimony they had maintained.” Revelation 6:9.
Further, a character in the film/novel, Karoly Keszei, who
is an artistic photographer and a wounded ex-soldier, refers to the above passage,
specifically mentioning the Fifth Seal, in a crucial monologue in the film.
Similarly the artist Bosch has additional relevance in the
film The Fifth Seal. The book
seller, László Kiraly (László Márkus), who is referred to mockingly as the “intellectual” in the film/novel, states that he procured two prized portions of meat for consumption, shown in
the film, on selling a Bosch painting, or possibly, a book on Bosch’s paintings.
Director Fabri intercuts important
pieces of dialogue with visuals of Bosch’s paintings. And interestingly much of
Bosch’s famous paintings deal with the Book of Revelation in the Holy Bible,
the perverted delights of a sinner, and martyrdom of various early Christians.
(Bosch is increasingly being acknowledged today as the first surrealist
painter, while surrealism as a movement is often considered to have begun only in
the 1920s. Works of Dali and those of Bosch are so strikingly similar, that one
wonders how four centuries could separate them.) And the film's director Fabri does not stop with the
paintings—he recreates visuals from Bosch’s paintings with live human beings
for the bookseller Kiraly to fantasize in a drunken stupor while reflecting on the
philosophical issues raised in the film/novel earlier.
The crucial moment towards the end of the film that redefines all that the viewer hasbeen shown and believes |
The film can be divided into three segments though these are
seamless. The first is the situation in the bar where Miklós Auricular (Lajos
Öze) a watchmaker, Kiraly the book seller, János Kovacs (Sándor Horváth) a carpenter, and Béla (Ferenc
Bencze) a barkeeper meet and discuss a variety of subjects in the presence of Keszei,
the artistic photographer, who joins these gentlemen for a drink by accident.
The second segment takes the characters out of the bar, where each come to a decision
as to who he would like be reborn as. The third segment puts all the characters
in an extreme environment, where interestingly for different reasons, all the characters
seemingly reverse their earlier decision made in the film to the question posed
by Mr Auricular. One metaphoric aside made by Mr Auricular is whether you would
choose to eat veal breast or an artichoke, if given an option, referring directly to the piece of meat the book-seller has procured to eat later. The third segment adds another aspect to the
final decisions—the aspect of self respect.
Bosch’s surreal images and the surrealist manifesto of the
1920s would nudge the viewer at the grim end of the film. All through the film, an intelligent viewer will note the characters in the film constantly reassess
their philosophical stance or points of view, according to circumstances. Nothing is as per the obvious. Keszei, the photographer,
lost his leg on the war front, like the slave in the philosophical conundrum and
believes he has a clear conscience. Yet his actions prove to be the opposite. The
viewer would also need to reassess his/her judgements of the characters the end of the film, particularly in in view of the past and
possible future intentions/actions of Mr Auricular.
Mr Auricular, the watchmaker, asks the carpenter the difficult philosophical question |
The final shots of the film underscore the fact that one is ultimately
alone and the final decision of a reflective soul could surprise oneself. This movie
is undoubtedly the best work of Zoltan Fabri, a marvellous filmmaker, who most
cineastes the world over have yet to discover. And this is possibly the best work of the author/novelist Ferenc Sánta, little known outside his country. This is a film with superb
performances (especially Lajos Öze as Mr Auricular), the lovely music of Georgy
Vukan that opens (with colourful details) and closes (in deliberate contrast with
a dark, blank screen) the film, intelligent editing (Ferencné Szécsényi),
and needless to add, a great script. The “intellectual” in the film would like
to distract himself with music or play snooker, when someone has been shot dead
outside. These are some of the little nuggets of detail that make this work truly
outstanding.
What is so remarkable about the film? The viewer will find that as the film progresses, the viewer's own judgement of the principal characters' response to their individual conscience keeps changing right up to the end. That's what will make you think deeply about this work of cinema.
Thank you, Mr Zoltan Fabri and Mr Ferenc Sánta, for the top-notch cinema.
What is so remarkable about the film? The viewer will find that as the film progresses, the viewer's own judgement of the principal characters' response to their individual conscience keeps changing right up to the end. That's what will make you think deeply about this work of cinema.
Thank you, Mr Zoltan Fabri and Mr Ferenc Sánta, for the top-notch cinema.
P.S. The full movie is available on You Tube. The film is one of
the author’s best 100 films. The author had interviewed Mr Zoltan Fabri in Budapest
in 1982 as a staff film critic of a daily newspaper published from New Delhi, India. The author suspects Larissa Shepitko's Russian film The Ascent (1977) borrowed heavily from The Fifth Seal following its Golden Prize win at Moscow Film Festival early in 1977. It is very likely that Shepitko had viewed the Hungarian film and structured her own script on the lines of the Hungarian film. Most viewers who laud Shepitko's film are not aware of Fabri's film. The author's 1982 interview with Mr Fabri in Budapest, Hungary, is also published on this blog.
No comments :
Post a Comment