Several directors in Europe have in recent years made outstanding award-winning films on the subject of working class bread-winners losing their jobs and trying their best to claw back to a life of normalcy by finding another. The processes are devastating in each case. Foremost award-winning examples are Stephen Brize’s Measure of a Man (2015, France) and the Dardennes bothers’ Two Days, One Night (2014, Belgium). I, Daniel Blake continues to lead the viewer along the same paths of the films but with a difference—the film underscores the inhuman apathy of government employment systems for those suddenly forced out of work. All three films have a common thread—when you are out of work and cannot find another—a sudden camaraderie develops between the unemployed and others who have faced similar situations.
I, Daniel Blake is an outstanding film of 2016. It is a film that combines good direction (by
the 80 year old veteran filmmaker Ken Loach who returned from retirement to
make this film), a marvellous and credible screenplay by Paul Laverty (Loach’s
colleague for the past dozen films), good editing, and two very creditable performances by the main players. It is not surprising that the film was
bestowed the Golden Palm (Palme d'Or), the top honour at the year’s Cannes film festival, to
Loach for the second time in 10 years.
What makes I, Daniel Blake stand out among the three films is Paul Laverty’s
ability to infuse wry humour in the carefully chosen words spoken by its
characters. Words matter in this film. The film opens with a dark screen. Then you hear a telephone conversation –a
conversation between Daniel Blake, a 59-year-old carpenter who had a recent
heart attack or a cardiac event, resulting in a near fall while working on a scaffolding
and medically advised not to resume work, and an anonymous employee from the
British Department of Work and Pensions quizzing him about all his physical
conditions except his ailing heart condition only to file a report on Blake that
is obviously and quixotically incomplete and misleading. This conversation sets the mood of what follows—the
apathetic world of bureaucracy that does not believe in empathy for those
suffering from a medical condition that prohibits working in their chosen
trade.
The good carpenter is good with
his hands and quite literate. But he is not computer literate. The British
Department of Work and Pensions works on-line, on telephone, and very rarely
face to face. How does Laverty put it into
words? Here is a fine example. The British Department staff tells Blake “We are digital by default.” Blake, who
has had a rough time posting his applications on-line answers the bureaucrat
sardonically, “I am a pencil by default.”
Carpenters work considerably with pencils. This is not flowery writing—the
script is socially loaded beyond the obvious repartee.
The audience can only agree with
Laverty and Loach when Blake calls the Department a “monumental farce.” One is reminded of the Cuban masterpiece Death of a Bureaucrat (1966) directed by Tomas Gutierrez Alea, in which a widow of a dead bureaucrat cannot access her widow’s pension and
benefits because a critical identity card was buried with her husband’s body in
the coffin and the Communist bureaucrats refuse to process her benefits without
it.
Both Laverty and Loach teams up
film after film to present us individuals who struggle to survive in a social
world that sweeps them away because of incidents that they cannot control or
intended to face. The Cannes’ Palme d’Or winner The Wind that Shakes the Barley (2006) where the main character
joins the IRA after he clearly made up his mind not to do that after witnessing
a life changing incident involving British troops or the comedy The Angels’ Share (2012) where a young Glaswegian
narrowly escapes prison sentencing and subsequent troubles by a chance visit to
a Scotch whisky distillery which ultimately leads to a well paid permanent job.
In Tickets (2005), a group of well-meaning
football-crazy Glaswegians on a train journey in Europe find one of them have
lost their ticket, possibly stolen and suddenly have to grapple with future consequences
of that situation that makes them more socially responsible. The dozen films of Loach and Laverty build on Loach’s
Kes (1969) written not by Laverty
but by a book by Barry Hines, where a young middle class school kid, given
little sympathy at home and in school takes interest in training a pet kestrel
by reading a book that he steals from a bookstore. Pre-Laverty and with Laverty, Loach has dealt
with characters whose lives change by events that were not planned.
What Laverty brought on Loach’s
table was spoken language that seemed to have a visual power beyond that of the
camera. “A pencil by default” is not something that you capture by the
camera; the viewer has to figure out the connection between a pencil and the
world of the carpenter. Apparently the film's script was prepared with help on inputs from real jobless urban poor who had to seek financial and food assistance in the UK and their experiences. The brilliance of Laverty’s screenplay writing comes
towards the end of the film, when the curriculum vitae that he was forced to
learn to write for getting a Job-Seekers’ Allowance is read out at his “pauper’s
funeral.” What is read out, are words
that we never could have guessed were written on the pieces of paper Blake was
handing out to prospective employers. And at least one did respond
positively. What is written by Blake is
Laverty’s magic that no camera could have captured. Daniel Blake is, as stated in
his own words in his CV read out at his funeral “a citizen—nothing more,
nothing less.”
I, Daniel Blake does not belong exclusively to director Loach and scriptwriter
Laverty. It belongs to two other talented individuals chosen by Loach—actor Dave
Johns who plays the character Daniel Blake and actress Hayley Squires who plays
who plays Katie, who accidently crosses the path of Daniel at the British
Department of Work and Pensions facilities. Now Katie is single mother of two
kids. She has been uprooted from London to Daniel’s town and arrives at the
office late because she boarded the wrong bus. Laverty’s magic allows both
these two wonderful human beings to meet when there being knocked around by the
unfeeling bureaucrats, by a "Laverty" accident. It is not surprising that Ms Squires has been nominated
for a BAFTA award but it is surprising that Dave Jones has not been nominated
for the restrained power of the performance, his first in a feature film. But
then one needs to congratulate Loach for picking these two main actors.
Director Loach has a team that he
works with on his recent films beyond the talented Laverty. A major team member is film editor
Jonathan Morris who has worked with Loach longer than Laverty. The editing in I, Daniel Blake, does not grab your attention until the ultimate “pauper’s
funeral.” Another member of the Loach
team is the cinematographer Robbie Ryan who worked on the three last Loach
films I, Daniel Blake, Jimmy’s Hall,
and The Angels’ Share. It only shows
that the Loach team has constantly evolved but the best of them tried and tested stay with
Loach.
I, Daniel Blake is undoubtedly the best work of Loach and deserved the Cannes honor.
I, Daniel Blake is undoubtedly the best work of Loach and deserved the Cannes honor.
P.S. I, Daniel Blake and Paradise are two outstanding
works included in the author’s top 10 films of 2016. Loach’s The Angel’s Share (2012) and Tickets (2005) were reviewed earlier on this blog and the former is one of the author’s top 10 films of 2012. Two other films mentioned in this review The Measure of a Man (2015, France) and Two Days,One Night (2014, Belgium) were also reviewed
earlier on this blog. Mr Loach is also one of the author's 15 favourite active filmmakers.
No comments :
Post a Comment